Poor thing, she might have to turn to food stamps.

One world govt. requires a one world religion.

The churches have been led to believe the green movement is godly, it’s exactly the opposite.

Canadians need to wake up and wake up fast.

Please read The Green Agenda found on the page bar of my blog.
It is the best I have found on the subject.
Read the words of the men that would rule the world and remove the Christian faith.
Please-read The Green Agenda.
http://www.windfarms.wordpress.com

Enjoy your day-very interesting times ahead

If you are involved in the church I would like to be in touch.

Ron

As I understand it, the theory, supported by experiments, of the Danish National Space Center goes as follows: Active sun = enhanced magnetic field = solar wind = geomagnetic shield response = less low-level clouds = less heat reflected = warmer climate.

Inactive sun = reduced magnetic field = reduced solar wind = geomagnetic shield drops = galactic cosmic ray flux = more low-level clouds and more snow = more heat reflected = colder climate.

That is how the bulk of climate change might work, modulated by sunspot peak frequency there are cycles of global warming and cooling like waves in the ocean. When the waves are closely spaced, the planets warm; when the waves are spaced farther apart, the planets cool.

AAAS published the correlation paper in Science in 1991 by Fris-Christiensen and Lassen. They demonstrated a 95% correlation between sunspot peak frequency and warming and cooling. Further correlation failed, likely due to cooling from Pinatubo eruption. Since then Svensmark et al (2006) published experimental support for the cosmic ray (sunspot modulated) hypothesis in the Journal of the Royal Society. Unfortunately all this was missed out by the UN IPCC. Whether this is a political issue or not, the public and media knowledge of the science is incomplete and unbalanced and needs to be brought out into the daylight.

The Danish National Space Center will be conducting further experiments in the CERN facility shortly. Politicians should know the lay of the land before they devote more money to warming than might be needed for overcoats for the homeless.

This has been in the literature since 1990s but the the nepotistic NA university community never recognises work by people outside their own church. I don’t think a real debate can be held because the politicians hold the keys to the research grant vault. Objective scientists will be starved out, while the junk derivative pot boilers continue.

….….